|
Integration and Implementation Sciences Thesaurus A developing vocubulary for an emerging specialization | ||||
|
I2S Thesaurus
External Resources
Development |
Structure & Style
PurposeThe Thesaurus of ERIC Descriptors, used to index documents of the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) of the United States government, provides a wealth of terminology appropriate for indexing Integration and Implementation Sciences (IIS) resources. These resources include articles, monographs and case studies as well as individuals, organizations, projects and events. The ERIC thesaurus does not provide full coverage, however, and thus the IIS Thesaurus was created as a supplement to provide terminology for indexing unique IIS concepts. Together, the ERIC thesaurus and the IIS Thesaurus constitute the IIS thesaurus system which represents the full scope of available controlled vocabulary for indexing and retrieving Integration and Implementation Sciences resources. SourcesThe IIS Thesaurus operates in conjunction with the Thesaurus of ERIC Descriptors, but also relies on the UNESCO Thesaurus to provide the authority for geographic place names. The official Web site for Integration and Implementation Sciences, hosted by Australian National University, and managed by Dr. Gabriele Bammer, was essential for identifying candidate vocabulary. Additional resources consulted in the construction of the IIS Thesaurus (articles, monographs, Web resources and other indexing languages) can be found in the Annotated Bibliography. Subject CoverageThe field of Integration and Implementation Sciences coordinates six primary areas of research from the exact and social sciences:
The IIS thesaurus system (ERIC and the IIS Thesaurus) is designed to cover these subjects to a moderate level of detail. For example, terms are included to represent the general concepts that comprise Complexity Science, including nonlinear dynamics, emergence, self-organisation, etc., but detailed terms more appropriate for a physics or mathematics thesaurus (e.g. bifurcation, phase transition, strange attractors, Lyapunov exponent) are not included. The IIS thesaurus also covers activities and conditions that comprise or affect the processes of integrating ideas, goals, disciplines and world views to solve complex, large scale problems. For example, the IIS Thesaurus dinstinctly recognize the value of unique concepts like PROBLEM DEFINIION, INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE, MARGINALISATION AND SCALABILITY. Numbers of TermsThere are nearly 6,300 terms in the ERIC thesaurus. The IIS Thesaurus contains 200 terms. 174 of these are preferred terms, while the remaining 26 terms provide entry vocabulary that guide users from the term they are investigating to the preferred term that is to be used in indexing. 33 terms in the IIS Thesaurus are originally from the ERIC thesaurus. The reasons for including ERIC terms are discussed in the Vocabulary Control section below. StyleThe follow descriptions refer only to the IIS Thesaurus. Structure and RelationshipsBTs, NTs, RTs Broad (BT) and narrow (NT) relationships between terms usually reflect a class/member relationship (e.g. BT: KNOWLEDGE, NT: EXPERT KNOWLEDGE). Other BT/NT relationships include whole/part (e.g. BT: HUMAN BODY, NT: BRAIN) and process/thing (e.g. BT: INSTRUCTION, NT: ASSIGNMENTS). The IIS Thesaurus is not currently poly-hierarchical. Each term has only one broader term (BT). When a term could logically be considered to fall under two broader terms, the second term is included as a related term. For example, in the IIS Thesaurus, COMPLEXITY THEORY is a narrower term (NT) of THEORIES (ERIC). It could also be considered a narrower term (NT) of COMPLEXITY SCIENCE, which is instead listed as a related term (RT). In the IIS Thesaurus, an average of 6 related terms (RTs) are provided for each preferred term. These terms have been included to alert the user to other potentially relevant terms also in the thesaurus. Preferred and Non-preferred Terms (USE, UF) Entry vocabulary is provided so that searchers may be lead from the term they are investigating to the approved (preferred) term to use in indexing and searching. These non-preferred to preferred relationships are identified by use (USE) references (e.g. COLLABORATION, USE COOPERATION (ERIC)). The reciprocal relationship is identified by a used for (UF) reference (e.g. COOPERATION (ERIC), UF COLLABORATION). Scope Notes (SN) Scope notes (SN) are often used only to differentiate between similar terms in a thesaurus. The IIS thesaurus, however, uses scope notes more liberally to clarify definitions even when a similar term is not present. This is necessary because similar terms to IIS Thesaurus terms may actually exist in the ERIC thesaurus. The scope notes (SN) in the IIS Thesaurus also help to give a stronger characterization of the field of Integration and Implementation Sciences than the terms alone. Reciprocal Relationships All relationships within the IIS Thesaurus are reciprocal (for each BT there is an NT, for each NT there is a BT, for each RT there is a corresponding RT, and for each USE there is a corresponding UF reference). At this time, however, BTs, NTs, RTs or other references are not made between the ERIC and IIS thesauri. Layout and DisplaysALPHA (Alphabetical) The alphabetical display lists all preferred and non-preferred terms in alphabetical order with any relationships (BT, NT, RT, USE, UF) or scope notes (SN). This display is most useful for scanning to find a specific term and then understanding the context and scope of that term. In the Alpha display of the IIS Thesaurus on the Web, all BT, NT, RT, USE, and UF references are hyperlinked to the referenced term(s). Example of a preferred term in alphabetical display: MEDIATION * The scope note (SN) and broader term (BT) restrict the use of this term and do not allow its use for the mediation of chemicals, emotions, or any other entities. Example of a non-preferred term and reciprocal preferred term in alphabetical display: COLLABORATION COOPERATION (ERIC) TREE (Hierarchical) The tree display is a hierarchical display which shows only the preferred terms in a rudimentary classification system established by the broader term (BT) and narrower term (NT) relationships. This display is useful for browsing and exploring subject areas to discover available terms that may not have been considered previously. The tree display does not show related terms or scope notes or allow for hyperlinking. EXACT SCIENCES Word Forms, Abbreviations, SpellingSingular/Plural Noun Forms All terms are formatted in noun forms. The plural form is used for count nouns (nouns about which one would ask "how many?"), and the singular form is used for mass nouns (nouns about which one would ask "how much?"). Composite Terms Composite terms, consisting of two or more words, appear in natural word order (e.g. COMPLEX PROBLEMS, not PROBLEMS, COMPLEX). Parenthetical Expressions Parenthetical expressions are used to differentiate between terms with more than one accepted meaning (e.g. INUIT (PEOPLE), INUIT (LANGUAGE)). Abbreviations The IIS Thesaurus uses the following abbreviations:
SN: Scope note "(ERIC)" Designation All terms and scope notes (SN) borrowed from ERIC for inclusion in the IIS Thesaurus are followed with the "(ERIC)" designation. The reasons for including ERIC terms are discussed in the Vocabulary Control section below. Spelling It was determined that the IIS Thesaurus should be written in International (British) English in service to the majority of its anticipated users (and the key scholar). The Thesaurus of ERIC Descriptors is a product of the American government and, as such, appears in American English. The IIS Thesaurus does its best to use British English, but it cannot when terms have been borrowed from ERIC. As such, the language of the IIS Thesaurus currently appears somewhat inconsistent. Once the relevant terms from ERIC have been imported into the ISS Thesaurus (See Next Steps), they can be modified to reflect the appropriate spellings. Vocabulary ControlHow terms were selected It was necessary to include some ERIC terms in the IIS Thesaurus. There are a number of reasons for "borrowing" ERIC terms:
All terms and scope notes (SN) borrowed from ERIC for inclusion the IIS Thesaurus are followed with the "(ERIC)" designation. With the exception of STATES, PROVINCES and NATIONS, geographic entities are not included in either the ERIC or IIS thesauri. Use the "Countries and country groupings" section of the UNESCO thesaurus to find approved terminology (http://www.ulcc.ac.uk/unesco/7.htm). You will not find smaller units than the states and commonwealths of the United States. The terms STATES and NATIONS are both included in the IIS Thesaurus. While some documents refer to sovereign nations as states, the IIS Thesaurus refers the user to the term NATIONS for this purpose. STATES is used only to refer to U.S. provincial entities. Terms in the IIS and ERIC thesauri are simple terms and not pre-coordinated to represent complex concepts. Therefore a concept like "collaborative research partnerships" might have to be represented with component terms like COOPERATION (ERIC), RESEARCH (ERIC), and PARTNERSHIPS. Decisions regarding word forms (plural, singular, etc.) are discussed in the Style section above. |
|||
|
Updated: 15 November 2005
Contact: CarynLAnderson@yahoo.com or Kyle Nicholls |
||||
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License
by Caryn L. Anderson.
|
||||